<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Stellarator on Stars on Earth</title>
    <link>https://nashboykin.com/tags/stellarator/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Stellarator on Stars on Earth</description>
    
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>2026 Nash Boykin · Stars on Earth</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2026 12:00:00 -0400</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://nashboykin.com/tags/stellarator/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Stellarator vs. Tokamak: What Each Bet Buys You</title>
      <link>https://nashboykin.com/posts/stellarator-vs-tokamak/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2026 12:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <guid>https://nashboykin.com/posts/stellarator-vs-tokamak/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I recently spoke with Lennart Bock at Proxima Fusion, and he got me thinking about stellarators. I&amp;rsquo;d just finished writing about &lt;a href=&#34;https://nashboykin.com/posts/laser-fusion-lcoe/&#34;&gt;laser fusion&lt;/a&gt; — one bet on how to hold a plasma together. Stellarators and tokamaks are a different fork: both use magnetic fields, and disagree about how to shape them.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What I actually wanted to know was which one wins. Turns out that&amp;rsquo;s the wrong question: the two designs aren&amp;rsquo;t competing to be better at the same thing. A tokamak buys compactness by driving a current through the plasma, which does most of the confinement work for free. A stellarator refuses that current and shapes the field entirely with a far more complex coil set. Every difference below traces back to that one decision.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
